The best online Debate website - DebateIsland.com! The only Online Debate Website with Casual, Persuade Me, Formalish, and Formal Online Debate formats. We’re the Leading Online Debate website. Debate popular topics, Debate news, or Debate anything! Debate online for free!
Climate Change
in Science
Debra AI Prediction
Arguments
  Considerate: 84%  
  Substantial: 60%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 92%  
  Sentiment: Neutral  
  Avg. Grade Level: 9.68  
  Sources: 0  
  Relevant (Beta): 95%  
  Learn More About Debra
You are just repeating your discredited claim. I have already explained why your claims don't work and you have failed to rebuttal my points.
I also notice you give no explanation for why you thought randomly including a definition helped your argument. I take it you concede it was a non sequitur.
  Considerate: 70%  
  Substantial: 74%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 92%  
  Sentiment: Negative  
  Avg. Grade Level: 10.48  
  Sources: 0  
  Relevant (Beta): 99%  
  Learn More About Debra
  Considerate: 78%  
  Substantial: 77%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 91%  
  Sentiment: Neutral  
  Avg. Grade Level: 8.54  
  Sources: 0  
  Relevant (Beta): 99%  
  Learn More About Debra
Never addressed what about the definition? I have literally asked you two posts ago what the supposed relevance of you providing the definition is and you did not respond to the question, merely reiterating your previous statement which you have refused to offer a defence of besides this random non-sequitur that you refuse to explain.
  Considerate: 79%  
  Substantial: 65%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 95%  
  Sentiment: Negative  
  Avg. Grade Level: 13.28  
  Sources: 0  
  Relevant (Beta): 96%  
  Learn More About Debra
WFT?!? This is the digital equivalent of shutting your eyes, sticking your fingers in your ears and shouting "La La La La La La La I can't hear you La La La La La La La La La La"
  Considerate: 32%  
  Substantial: 41%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 88%  
  Sentiment: Negative  
  Avg. Grade Level: 12.08  
  Sources: 0  
  Relevant (Beta): 92%  
  Learn More About Debra
I have asked you what point you are trying to make like half a dozen times now. You have posted a random definition, referred to it as something I had to somehow not address but not explained why, repeated your already repudiated claims without offering any rebuttal to the points raised, etc, etc.
If you have a point that works as a counter argument, what is it? If not, why are you wasting time?
  Considerate: 70%  
  Substantial: 80%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 97%  
  Sentiment: Negative  
  Avg. Grade Level: 10.22  
  Sources: 0  
  Relevant (Beta): 96%  
  Learn More About Debra
  Considerate: 88%  
  Substantial: 75%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 96%  
  Sentiment: Neutral  
  Avg. Grade Level: 10.66  
  Sources: 0  
  Relevant (Beta): 97%  
  Learn More About Debra
  Considerate: 65%  
  Substantial: 40%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 93%  
  Sentiment: Neutral  
  Avg. Grade Level: 10.44  
  Sources: 0  
  Relevant (Beta): 99%  
  Learn More About Debra
  Considerate: 96%  
  Substantial: 27%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 93%  
  Sentiment: Neutral  
  Avg. Grade Level: 10.54  
  Sources: 0  
  Relevant (Beta): 84%  
  Learn More About Debra
  Considerate: 84%  
  Substantial: 93%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 98%  
  Sentiment: Positive  
  Avg. Grade Level: 8.72  
  Sources: 0  
  Relevant (Beta): 98%  
  Learn More About Debra
  Considerate: 89%  
  Substantial: 73%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 95%  
  Sentiment: Neutral  
  Avg. Grade Level: 9.1  
  Sources: 0  
  Relevant (Beta): 99%  
  Learn More About Debra
We don't live in the troposphere? Come again?
  Considerate: 76%  
  Substantial: 24%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 100%  
  Sentiment: Neutral  
  Avg. Grade Level: 10.14  
  Sources: 0  
  Relevant (Beta): 94%  
  Learn More About Debra
This has gone so far in the US that you can't get papers published that are counter to the global warmist claims and you have to look at European research.
http://principia-scientific.org/another-new-paper-slays-co2-greenhouse-gas-thought-experiment/
https://arxiv.org/PS_cache/arxiv/pdf/0707/0707.1161v4.pdf
When you look deeply enough into it there has been so much counterfeiting of data by the warmies that it's nothing less than unscrupulous and should end these people's careers.
  Considerate: 84%  
  Substantial: 96%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 95%  
  Sentiment: Neutral  
  Avg. Grade Level: 10.1  
  Sources: 6  
  Relevant (Beta): 89%  
  Learn More About Debra
  Considerate: 88%  
  Substantial: 94%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 94%  
  Sentiment: Neutral  
  Avg. Grade Level: 7.84  
  Sources: 0  
  Relevant (Beta): 100%  
  Learn More About Debra
  Considerate: 92%  
  Substantial: 76%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 86%  
  Sentiment: Positive  
  Avg. Grade Level: 9.46  
  Sources: 6  
  Relevant (Beta): 89%  
  Learn More About Debra
  Considerate: 81%  
  Substantial: 74%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 96%  
  Sentiment: Neutral  
  Avg. Grade Level: 7.72  
  Sources: 0  
  Relevant (Beta): 98%  
  Learn More About Debra
  Considerate: 90%  
  Substantial: 63%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 94%  
  Sentiment: Positive  
  Avg. Grade Level: 8.3  
  Sources: 0  
  Relevant (Beta): 86%  
  Learn More About Debra
Isn't this more of an indication that what appears to be confirmation bias is actually just different opinions by followers of different groups? A group opinion if you will?
  Considerate: 87%  
  Substantial: 70%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 98%  
  Sentiment: Negative  
  Avg. Grade Level: 11.36  
  Sources: 0  
  Relevant (Beta): 84%  
  Learn More About Debra
  Considerate: 88%  
  Substantial: 73%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 92%  
  Sentiment: Neutral  
  Avg. Grade Level: 11.68  
  Sources: 0  
  Relevant (Beta): 97%  
  Learn More About Debra
What about nations? Does a nation form under nothing more than confirmation bias? Does reading about a car wreck in the news a confirmation bias, or is it just a common thing people read about in the news? Is the observation of the daily sunrise a confirmation bias? Most of us observe it.
This might be a good topic for another debate alone.
  Considerate: 91%  
  Substantial: 79%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 97%  
  Sentiment: Negative  
  Avg. Grade Level: 7.4  
  Sources: 0  
  Relevant (Beta): 87%  
  Learn More About Debra
As noted earlier the hoover.org graph was a cheery picked mislead graph. Hoover.org is a bias mislead conservative group[2].
[1]https://www.theguardian.com/environment/climate-consensus-97-per-cent/2016/apr/19/study-humans-have-caused-all-the-global-warming-since-1950
[2]https://www.sourcewatch.org/index.php/Hoover_Institution_on_War,_Revolution_and_Peace
  Considerate: 76%  
  Substantial: 42%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 91%  
  Sentiment: Positive  
  Avg. Grade Level: 8  
  Sources: 2  
  Relevant (Beta): 50%  
  Learn More About Debra